Difference between revisions of "Talk:How to contribute"
From K5Wiki
SamHartman (talk | contribs) |
(New section: how the others do it...) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: I think the current level of detail is fine for now, although things may need to get broken out as more content develops. --[[User:SamHartman|SamHartman]] 11:28, 3 April 2008 (EDT) |
: I think the current level of detail is fine for now, although things may need to get broken out as more content develops. --[[User:SamHartman|SamHartman]] 11:28, 3 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == how the others do it... == |
||
| + | |||
| + | I noticed that ''How to contribute'' pages on other opensource sites refer to contributing to ''development'', not contributing to the wiki. I think we should divide this into 2 pages, explicitly titled ''How to contribute to Kerberos'' and ''How to contribute to this wiki''. |
||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Estone|Estone]] 14:18, 10 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
Revision as of 13:18, 10 April 2008
ers:
Began page with links to relevant wikimedia information. Is this too redundant (you can find this info via Help) or is it useful to give a task-oriented pointer?
- I think a task-oriented pointer is useful. I have added some stuff explicitly referring to the Wikipedia Manual of Style. A few other things are useful to have direct pointers to. The Wikipedia and MediaWiki references may be too voluminous for basic tasks.--TomYu 00:23, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
- I think the current level of detail is fine for now, although things may need to get broken out as more content develops. --SamHartman 11:28, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
how the others do it...
I noticed that How to contribute pages on other opensource sites refer to contributing to development, not contributing to the wiki. I think we should divide this into 2 pages, explicitly titled How to contribute to Kerberos and How to contribute to this wiki.
--Estone 14:18, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
