Talk:How to contribute - Revision history

SamHartman at 21:11, 10 April 2008

2008-04-10T21:11:45Z

Estone: New section: how the others do it...

2008-04-10T18:18:49Z

New section: how the others do it...

SamHartman at 15:28, 3 April 2008

2008-04-03T15:28:23Z

TomYu at 04:23, 3 April 2008

2008-04-03T04:23:15Z

Estone: New page: ers: Began page with links to relevant wikimedia information. Is this too redundant (you can find this info via Help) or is it useful to give a task-oriented pointer?

2008-04-03T00:30:08Z

New page: ers: Began page with links to relevant wikimedia information. Is this too redundant (you can find this info via Help) or is it useful to give a task-oriented pointer?

New page

ers:

Began page with links to relevant wikimedia information. Is this too redundant (you can find this info via Help) or is it useful to give a task-oriented pointer?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 10 April 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	--[[User:Estone\|Estone]] 14:18, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		--[[User:Estone\|Estone]] 14:18, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I agree the primary focus of this page should be how to contribute to development of the project. I think using the wiki, which for this wiki implies contributing to it, falls into that. I agree that once we have enough content to split the page, we should do so. I wouldn't worry about splitting though until the page is 50K plus.
		+	:--[[User:SamHartman\|SamHartman]] 17:11, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 10 April 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: I think the current level of detail is fine for now, although things may need to get broken out as more content develops. --[[User:SamHartman\|SamHartman]] 11:28, 3 April 2008 (EDT)		: I think the current level of detail is fine for now, although things may need to get broken out as more content develops. --[[User:SamHartman\|SamHartman]] 11:28, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	== how the others do it... ==
		+
		+	I noticed that ''How to contribute'' pages on other opensource sites refer to contributing to ''development'', not contributing to the wiki. I think we should divide this into 2 pages, explicitly titled ''How to contribute to Kerberos'' and ''How to contribute to this wiki''.
		+
		+	--[[User:Estone\|Estone]] 14:18, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 3 April 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: I think a task-oriented pointer is useful. I have added some stuff explicitly referring to the Wikipedia Manual of Style. A few other things are useful to have direct pointers to. The Wikipedia and MediaWiki references may be too voluminous for basic tasks.--[[User:TomYu\|TomYu]] 00:23, 3 April 2008 (EDT)		: I think a task-oriented pointer is useful. I have added some stuff explicitly referring to the Wikipedia Manual of Style. A few other things are useful to have direct pointers to. The Wikipedia and MediaWiki references may be too voluminous for basic tasks.--[[User:TomYu\|TomYu]] 00:23, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	: I think the current level of detail is fine for now, although things may need to get broken out as more content develops. --[[User:SamHartman\|SamHartman]] 11:28, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 3 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Began page with links to relevant wikimedia information. Is this too redundant (you can find this info via Help) or is it useful to give a task-oriented pointer?		Began page with links to relevant wikimedia information. Is this too redundant (you can find this info via Help) or is it useful to give a task-oriented pointer?
		+
		+	: I think a task-oriented pointer is useful. I have added some stuff explicitly referring to the Wikipedia Manual of Style. A few other things are useful to have direct pointers to. The Wikipedia and MediaWiki references may be too voluminous for basic tasks.--[[User:TomYu\|TomYu]] 00:23, 3 April 2008 (EDT)