Talk:Coding style/C - Revision history

SamHartman: fix formatting

2008-04-11T08:18:57Z

fix formatting

SamHartman: Yes we do

2008-04-11T08:17:44Z

Yes we do

TomYu at 02:17, 11 April 2008

2008-04-11T02:17:38Z

SamHartman: respond

2008-04-10T21:09:10Z

respond

Estone: New page: We appear to have 2 ''Coding Style'' pages, and an hook for a link on the ''How to contribute page''. How about one article/page on Coding Style, and fix the link accordingly? --~~~~

2008-04-10T18:30:02Z

New page: We appear to have 2 ''Coding Style'' pages, and an hook for a link on the ''How to contribute page''. How about one article/page on Coding Style, and fix the link accordingly? --~~~~

New page

We appear to have 2 ''Coding Style'' pages, and an hook for a link on the ''How to contribute page''. How about one article/page on Coding Style, and fix the link accordingly?

--[[User:Estone|Estone]] 14:30, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :: Do we want to make the "C language" aspect of the coding style pages implicit, deleting the "C" level of the page name hierarchy?  It's not like we extensively use any other languages, at least for the core library code.  [[Coding style]] is intended to eventually have its current wall of text divided among a few smaller pages. --[[User:TomYu|TomYu]] 22:17, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Proponents
-##[[User:SamHartman|SamHartman]] 04:17, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
+*#[[User:SamHartman|SamHartman]] 04:17, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Concerns

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:17, 11 April 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:: Do we want to make the "C language" aspect of the coding style pages implicit, deleting the "C" level of the page name hierarchy? It's not like we extensively use any other languages, at least for the core library code. [[Coding style]] is intended to eventually have its current wall of text divided among a few smaller pages. --[[User:TomYu\|TomYu]] 22:17, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		:: Do we want to make the "C language" aspect of the coding style pages implicit, deleting the "C" level of the page name hierarchy? It's not like we extensively use any other languages, at least for the core library code. [[Coding style]] is intended to eventually have its current wall of text divided among a few smaller pages. --[[User:TomYu\|TomYu]] 22:17, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
		+	* Proponents
		+	##[[User:SamHartman\|SamHartman]] 04:17, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
		+	* Concerns

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 11 April 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:--[[User:SamHartman\|SamHartman]] 17:09, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		:--[[User:SamHartman\|SamHartman]] 17:09, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	:: Do we want to make the "C language" aspect of the coding style pages implicit, deleting the "C" level of the page name hierarchy? It's not like we extensively use any other languages, at least for the core library code. [[Coding style]] is intended to eventually have its current wall of text divided among a few smaller pages. --[[User:TomYu\|TomYu]] 22:17, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 10 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	--[[User:Estone\|Estone]] 14:30, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		--[[User:Estone\|Estone]] 14:30, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
		+	:I think we need multiple coding style pages, but I think we only need two levels of hierarchy. I.E. I could see [[Codingy style/Error handling]] or [[Coding style/Strings]] and [[Coding style/Formatting]] but I don't see a reason to split it out for C. I'm fairly sure the intent is to have [[Coding style]] become the generic stuff and have pointers to the more detailed pages.
		+
		+	:--[[User:SamHartman\|SamHartman]] 17:09, 10 April 2008 (EDT)